Korean vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Korean
French
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Koreans
French
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,455,609 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,650,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 13.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | French |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.0% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 27.8% |
| Median | 11.8% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 29.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to French by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |