Kenyan vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
Costa Ricans
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,254,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.25%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 69.6% |
Range | 30.8% | 63.1% |
Mean | 22.4% | 25.8% |
Median | 21.2% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 30.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |