Japanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 4.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.2% |
| Range | 95.9% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 14.0% |
| Median | 16.0% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and American (14.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |