Jamaican vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Mexican American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Mexican American Indians
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,307,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 26.3% |
Range | 34.1% | 24.9% |
Mean | 11.4% | 13.1% |
Median | 10.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Mexican American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |