Iranian vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Iranian
Chinese
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Iranians
Chinese
20.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
54.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,982,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,601,835 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 24.1%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.8% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 39.8% |
Range | 65.1% | 37.7% |
Mean | 22.8% | 16.3% |
Median | 18.0% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.3% | 21.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 8.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Nigeria (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (20.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Belizean (20.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Fijian (20.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (20.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Malaysians | 72.7 /100 | #163 | Good 19.9% |
Central Americans | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 19.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 69.3 /100 | #165 | Good 19.9% |
Belgians | 69.1 /100 | #166 | Good 19.9% |
Czechoslovakians | 61.8 /100 | #167 | Good 20.0% |
Fijians | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 20.0% |
Hmong | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 20.0% |
Iranians | 54.7 /100 | #170 | Average 20.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 20.1% |
Belizeans | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 20.1% |
Irish | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 20.1% |
Swedes | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 20.1% |
South American Indians | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 20.1% |
Kenyans | 44.9 /100 | #176 | Average 20.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 44.2 /100 | #177 | Average 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Cuba (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from India (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Portugal (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Philippines (16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and Immigrants from the Azores (16.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.1% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.1% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.2% |