Iranian vs Bulgarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Bulgarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Bulgarians
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Bulgarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 4.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 0.25% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 53.6% |
Range | 27.5% | 53.3% |
Mean | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Median | 9.0% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Bulgarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |