Inupiat vs Bangladeshi Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Bangladeshi
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Bangladeshis
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Bangladeshi Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,140 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 24.2%, a difference of 4.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 8.3% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 73.6% | 50.0% |
Range | 65.3% | 43.1% |
Mean | 30.3% | 24.3% |
Median | 24.4% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Bangladeshis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |