Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Afghanistan
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,562,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,212,211 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 3.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Afghanistan |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 50.0% |
Range | 19.1% | 47.8% |
Mean | 10.2% | 12.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Afghanistan by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |