Immigrants vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from North America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from North America
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,347,863 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 17.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 73.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.5% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 26.2% |
| Median | 14.4% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 24.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |