Immigrants from Western Europe vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Europe
Yugoslavian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Europe
Yugoslavians
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Europe vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,468,603 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Europe | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 26.2% |
Range | 29.2% | 25.6% |
Mean | 14.6% | 9.3% |
Median | 11.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe and Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Puget Sound Salish (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |