Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Samoan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Samoans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Samoan |
Minimum | 5.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 52.0% | 62.7% |
Range | 46.9% | 58.7% |
Mean | 19.9% | 23.3% |
Median | 18.6% | 20.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |