Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
11.8%
POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
72.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,064,410 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,425,744 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 36.1% | 24.5% |
Range | 34.3% | 23.9% |
Mean | 10.4% | 10.5% |
Median | 9.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |