Immigrants from Switzerland vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,929,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,222,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 22.5%, a difference of 2.9%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Switzerland	Bangladeshi
Minimum	15.3%	2.2%
Maximum	100.0%	47.8%
Range	84.7%	45.6%
Mean	44.5%	21.1%
Median	26.2%	20.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	21.7%	16.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	81.7%	25.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	59.9%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	31.3%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	30.3%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Bangladeshis by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Bahamian (21.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Honduras (21.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Spanish American (21.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Alaskan Athabascan (22.5%, a difference of 0.050%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Indonesian (22.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Senegal (22.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and French American Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 21.8%
Bahamians	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 21.8%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 21.9%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #279	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.1 /100 \| #280	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.1 /100 \| #281	Tragic 21.9%
Bermudans	0.1 /100 \| #282	Tragic 21.9%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 22.0%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 22.0%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 22.0%
Ugandans	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 22.1%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 22.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 22.3%
French American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 22.3%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 22.4%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 22.5%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 22.5%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 22.5%
Indonesians	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 22.5%