Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Czechoslovakian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Czechoslovakians
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,670,593 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 37.0% |
Range | 19.3% | 36.8% |
Mean | 9.0% | 12.4% |
Median | 8.7% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Paraguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%), European (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Canada (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |