Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Peruvian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Peruvian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Peruvians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
68.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Peruvian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,496,768 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Peruvian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 33.3% |
Range | 11.5% | 32.5% |
Mean | 8.4% | 9.5% |
Median | 8.1% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Peruvians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |