Immigrants from South Africa vs Slovene Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,050,915 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,613,004 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Slovene
Minimum	1.8%	0.42%
Maximum	74.6%	27.6%
Range	72.8%	27.2%
Mean	23.9%	13.3%
Median	18.5%	12.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.6%	8.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.7%	16.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	21.1%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.3%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.8%	6.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Slovenes by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Swedish (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Tsimshian (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Polish (12.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Norway (12.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Peru (12.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Western Asia (12.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (12.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Mongolian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Swedes	95.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 12.7%
Tsimshian	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 12.7%
Poles	94.9 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	94.4 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Peru	94.3 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 12.7%
Australians	94.1 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 12.8%
Danes	93.9 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	93.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	93.8 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Brazil	93.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 12.8%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 12.8%
Mongolians	93.0 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	93.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 12.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 12.8%
Romanians	92.8 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	92.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 12.8%
Slovenes	92.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 12.8%