Immigrants from Russia vs South African Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
South African
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
South Africans
15.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs South African Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,488,054 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,650,915 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | South African |
Minimum | 2.4% | 8.7% |
Maximum | 77.3% | 59.2% |
Range | 74.9% | 50.5% |
Mean | 21.7% | 27.1% |
Median | 15.9% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 46.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 30.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 15.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Burmese (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Jordanian (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 83.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |