Immigrants from Oceania vs Pakistani Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,979,017 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,227,918 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.51%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Pakistani
Minimum	10.9%	4.7%
Maximum	48.8%	100.0%
Range	37.9%	95.3%
Mean	21.1%	27.7%
Median	19.8%	20.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.3%	16.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.4%	32.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.0%	15.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.1%	19.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	19.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Pakistanis by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Latin America (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Yugoslavian (19.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Belize (19.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%
French Canadians	73.0 /100 \| #162	Good 19.9%
Malaysians	72.7 /100 \| #163	Good 19.9%
Central Americans	70.0 /100 \| #164	Good 19.9%