Immigrants from Moldova vs Taiwanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Taiwanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Taiwanese
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Taiwanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,791,948 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.862 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,221,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.7% |
Range | 95.7% | 38.3% |
Mean | 19.0% | 12.8% |
Median | 12.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.6% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Taiwanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |