Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Potawatomi Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,234,084 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,473,680 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 0.20%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Potawatomi
Minimum	0.99%	2.0%
Maximum	39.2%	62.5%
Range	38.2%	60.5%
Mean	17.4%	24.3%
Median	18.4%	21.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.5%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.8%	29.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.3%	10.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.0%	12.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	12.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Potawatomi by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Ghana (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Ecuadorian (19.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Ecuadorian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Ghana (19.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.1%, a difference of 0.43%), French American Indian (18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.8 /100 \| #239	Tragic 18.5%
Ghanaians	0.8 /100 \| #240	Tragic 18.6%
Alsatians	0.7 /100 \| #241	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.6 /100 \| #242	Tragic 18.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.6 /100 \| #243	Tragic 18.7%
Cape Verdeans	0.6 /100 \| #244	Tragic 18.7%
Shoshone	0.5 /100 \| #245	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.4 /100 \| #246	Tragic 18.8%
French American Indians	0.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 18.9%
Ecuadorians	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.0%
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.1%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.1%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.1%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.2%
Inupiat	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.2%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.2%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.2%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.3%