Immigrants from Micronesia vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Scotch-Irish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Scotch-Irish
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,492,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,342,644 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 0.45%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Scotch-Irish |
Minimum | 5.4% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.7% | 91.9% |
Mean | 26.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 22.8% | 36.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.8% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.2% | 51.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Scotch-Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.24%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |