Immigrants from Mexico vs Kiowa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Kiowa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Kiowa
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Kiowa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,228,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,097,884 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 9.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Kiowa |
Minimum | 6.7% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 34.7% |
Range | 93.3% | 25.9% |
Mean | 27.4% | 20.1% |
Median | 21.1% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.0% | 25.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.1% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Kiowa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 3.2%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |