Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,250,981 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.9% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 24.3% | 53.8% |
Range | 20.4% | 52.0% |
Mean | 11.8% | 14.4% |
Median | 11.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Asian (14.0%, a difference of 0.93%), Cypriot (14.0%, a difference of 0.93%), Bulgarian (13.9%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and Bolivian (13.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 14.1% |