Immigrants from Kenya vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Hmong
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Hmong
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,162,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Hmong |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 19.6% | 10.7% |
| Range | 19.2% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Hmong by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |