Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Immigrants from Malaysia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Immigrants from Malaysia
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.34% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 49.6% |
Range | 29.4% | 46.2% |
Mean | 11.9% | 12.6% |
Median | 12.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |