Immigrants from Japan vs Chinese Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Chinese
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Chinese
26.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Chinese Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,940,354 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,411,570 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 24.6%, a difference of 7.2%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Chinese |
Minimum | 10.7% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 63.6% |
Range | 89.3% | 61.1% |
Mean | 32.6% | 24.6% |
Median | 23.6% | 24.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.6% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Chinese by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (26.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Asia (26.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Moldova (26.2%, a difference of 0.55%), Burmese (26.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Korea (26.2%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Iran (25.1%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Lithuania (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (25.3%, a difference of 2.6%), Iranian (25.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and Bhutanese (25.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.6% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 25.1% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 25.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 26.4% |