Immigrants from Ireland vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Pima
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,318,290 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 70.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Pima |
Minimum | 6.7% | 16.1% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.1% | 83.9% |
Mean | 18.7% | 42.9% |
Median | 17.0% | 41.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 55.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 30.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 22.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |