Immigrants from Iran vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Navajo
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Navajo
12.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,647,005 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,292,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 142.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Navajo |
Minimum | 0.46% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 98.2% |
Mean | 9.0% | 40.4% |
Median | 8.2% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 52.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 30.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.7%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |