Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Moldova Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Immigrants from Moldova
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Immigrants from Moldova
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Moldova Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,829,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,368,843 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.72%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Immigrants from Moldova |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 27.5% |
Range | 28.7% | 24.7% |
Mean | 10.0% | 11.4% |
Median | 9.1% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Moldova by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |