Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Poland Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Poland
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Poland
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Poland Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,660,101 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Poland |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 22.5% |
Range | 14.5% | 20.2% |
Mean | 8.4% | 8.8% |
Median | 8.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Poland by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Czech (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |