Immigrants from Germany vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
Immigrants from Hong Kong
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,610,140 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 16.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 7.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 18.6% |
| Range | 92.5% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 23.6% | 9.4% |
| Median | 15.7% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |