Immigrants from England vs Syrian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,281,453 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,724,041 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.96%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from England	Syrian
Minimum	11.0%	0.91%
Maximum	100.0%	85.7%
Range	89.0%	84.8%
Mean	30.3%	15.9%
Median	19.1%	13.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.7%	9.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	36.8%	16.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	23.1%	6.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	25.4%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	24.8%	14.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Syrians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are South African (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Brazilian (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Czech (12.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Canada (12.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Western Asia	92.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 12.8%
Slovenes	92.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	91.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	91.2 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 12.9%
Czechs	90.3 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 12.9%
Syrians	90.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| North America	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 12.9%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	89.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 12.9%
Pakistanis	88.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 13.0%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.3 /100 \| #132	Excellent 13.0%
Serbians	87.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 13.0%
Afghans	85.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 13.0%
South Africans	85.7 /100 \| #135	Excellent 13.0%
Immigrants \| England	85.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 13.0%
Immigrants \| Chile	84.6 /100 \| #137	Excellent 13.1%
Brazilians	84.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 13.1%
Austrians	83.7 /100 \| #139	Excellent 13.1%
Immigrants \| Iraq	83.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 13.1%
New Zealanders	83.4 /100 \| #141	Excellent 13.1%
Scandinavians	82.3 /100 \| #142	Excellent 13.1%