Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Slovene Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Slovene
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Slovenes
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Slovene Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,812,664 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Slovene |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Range | 18.3% | 18.3% |
Mean | 7.4% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slovenes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |