Immigrants from Chile vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Turks
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,893,830 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.10%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Turkish |
Minimum | 3.8% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 44.7% | 62.2% |
Range | 40.9% | 58.9% |
Mean | 15.9% | 18.2% |
Median | 12.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |