Immigrants from Chile vs Mongolian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,144,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,133,739 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 2.1%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Mongolian
Minimum	2.3%	2.4%
Maximum	34.3%	58.2%
Range	32.0%	55.7%
Mean	16.5%	19.3%
Median	15.9%	15.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.0%	10.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.4%	23.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.8%	13.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Mongolians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5

In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are German (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (16.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Brazilian (16.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (16.4%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Peru (16.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Swiss (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Jordan (16.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.2 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 16.1%
Immigrants \| Peru	92.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 16.1%
Mongolians	92.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 16.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 16.1%
Austrians	92.0 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 16.1%
Swiss	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 16.1%
Native Hawaiians	91.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 16.2%
Immigrants \| Albania	91.8 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 16.2%
Immigrants \| England	91.5 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 16.2%
South Africans	90.1 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 16.2%
British	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 16.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	89.3 /100 \| #130	Excellent 16.3%
Finns	88.3 /100 \| #131	Excellent 16.3%
Serbians	88.2 /100 \| #132	Excellent 16.3%
Icelanders	87.9 /100 \| #133	Excellent 16.3%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	87.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 16.4%
Brazilians	87.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 16.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 16.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	85.3 /100 \| #137	Excellent 16.4%
Germans	84.8 /100 \| #138	Excellent 16.5%
Immigrants \| Hungary	84.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 16.5%