Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Australia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Australia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Australia
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Australia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,808,313 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 30.3% |
Range | 14.0% | 28.6% |
Mean | 9.0% | 8.9% |
Median | 9.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Scandinavian (7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |