Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Nicaraguan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Nicaraguan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Nicaraguans
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Nicaraguan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,278,151 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,615,173 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 36.2% | 36.5% |
| Range | 31.0% | 32.4% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 14.7% |
| Median | 14.7% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Nicaraguans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Ghana (14.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (14.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (13.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and French American Indian (13.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |