Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,470,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,100,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.93%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Russian
Minimum	6.0%	6.9%
Maximum	44.9%	100.0%
Range	38.8%	93.1%
Mean	18.9%	24.7%
Median	17.1%	19.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.1%	16.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.2%	24.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.8%	16.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	16.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Austrian (19.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%