Immigrants from Bolivia vs Norwegian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Norwegian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Norwegians
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Norwegian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,712,653 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,786,336 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.68%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Norwegian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 41.5% |
Range | 30.6% | 41.1% |
Mean | 9.4% | 10.4% |
Median | 8.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Norwegians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |