Immigrants from Belarus vs Swedish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Swedish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Swedes
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Swedish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,021,334 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 6.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Swedish |
Minimum | 5.6% | 7.9% |
Maximum | 51.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.1% | 92.1% |
Mean | 20.8% | 35.5% |
Median | 18.5% | 26.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 20.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 43.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 23.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |