Immigrants from Asia vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Jordanian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Jordanians
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,712,278 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.528 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Jordanian |
Minimum | 5.9% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 34.8% |
Range | 24.4% | 33.7% |
Mean | 16.3% | 17.3% |
Median | 16.3% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from North Macedonia (18.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (18.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Moldova (18.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |