Hmong vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Iroquois
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Iroquois
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 10.2% | 21.3% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 4.3% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |