Guamanian/Chamorro vs Yugoslavian Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Yugoslavian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Yugoslavians
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Yugoslavian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,867,885 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,571,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.0% |
Range | 98.3% | 24.3% |
Mean | 15.8% | 10.4% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Yugoslavians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.92%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |