Guamanian/Chamorro vs Polish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Polish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Poles
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
19.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Polish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,536,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,988,373 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 7.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Polish |
| Minimum | 10.2% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 71.1% | 37.4% |
| Range | 60.8% | 35.4% |
| Mean | 25.1% | 13.9% |
| Median | 17.3% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Northern European (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Estonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Sudanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
| Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
| Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
| Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
| Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
| Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |