Guamanian/Chamorro vs Afghan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Afghan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Afghans
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Afghan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,814,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Afghan |
Minimum | 1.2% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 31.3% |
Range | 98.8% | 27.0% |
Mean | 17.2% | 13.2% |
Median | 11.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Afghans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |