German Russian vs Hmong Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
German Russian
Hmong
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
German Russians
Hmong
23.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German Russian vs Hmong Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,093,035 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 23.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German Russian | Hmong |
| Minimum | 14.3% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 55.7% | 53.4% |
| Range | 41.4% | 49.1% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 25.8% |
| Median | 25.0% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.9% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to German Russians and Hmong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to German Russians are Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |