Filipino vs Indian (Asian) Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Indian (Asian)
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Indians (Asian)
11.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Indian (Asian) Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,600,431 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 16.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 27.7% |
Range | 30.7% | 26.3% |
Mean | 8.9% | 11.5% |
Median | 8.3% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Indians (Asian) by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |