Fijian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Fijian
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Fijians
Yugoslavians
20.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
59.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
79.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,734,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,461,515 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 6.5% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.7% |
Range | 93.5% | 82.5% |
Mean | 25.5% | 23.8% |
Median | 19.1% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 26.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Yugoslavians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Czechoslovakian (20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Hmong (20.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Iranian (20.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (19.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Eastern European (19.9%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Hungarian (19.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Syrians | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 19.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 79.7 /100 | #151 | Good 19.8% |
Yugoslavians | 79.0 /100 | #152 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Japan | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 19.8% |
Hungarians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 19.8% |
Danes | 75.5 /100 | #157 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 19.8% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 19.8% |
Pakistanis | 74.1 /100 | #160 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 74.1 /100 | #161 | Good 19.8% |
French Canadians | 73.0 /100 | #162 | Good 19.9% |
Malaysians | 72.7 /100 | #163 | Good 19.9% |
Central Americans | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 19.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 69.3 /100 | #165 | Good 19.9% |
Belgians | 69.1 /100 | #166 | Good 19.9% |
Czechoslovakians | 61.8 /100 | #167 | Good 20.0% |
Fijians | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 20.0% |
Hmong | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 20.0% |
Iranians | 54.7 /100 | #170 | Average 20.1% |