English vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
English
Carpatho Rusyn
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
English
Carpatho Rusyns
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,516,168 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,506,297 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.8% |
Range | 95.7% | 77.8% |
Mean | 25.5% | 18.2% |
Median | 16.4% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 19.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.2% | 15.1% |
Demographics Similar to English and Carpatho Rusyns by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |