Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Sudan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Sudan
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,745 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Sudan |
Minimum | 0.14% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 43.0% |
Range | 28.5% | 41.3% |
Mean | 14.8% | 15.7% |
Median | 14.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Sudan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |